WHO adopts Pandemic Accord — is it a 'global health victory' or bureaucratic mirage?

Subhead:Independent Researcher James Roguski cuts through the propaganda and pharmaceutical profit motives behind the WHO’s latest move in Geneva, Switzerland.#

YouTube-embed:q5Tuy6D4hto

You’ve likely heard the buzz about a global health agreement, sold to the public as something that won’t compromise national sovereignty but will be a legally binding treaty adopted by member states to allegedly enhance global cooperation, equity, and preparedness for future pandemics.

The World Health Organization’s (WHO) so-called Pandemic Accord was adopted at the recent World Health Assembly in Geneva, Switzerland, with WHO head honcho Tedros claiming this as a big win.

X-embed:1924735901722157505

But is it really a done deal, or just another chapter in a masterclass of propaganda?

Independent researcher James Roguski, who has been relentlessly tracking the WHO’s moves, unpacks the truth from the smoke in mirrors.

He calls the recent “adoption” a failure dressed up as a victory, explaining how the WHO didn’t even have a working draft for a key part of this accord — the Pathogen Access and Benefit Sharing (PABS) annex.

Author: contributor

Leave a Reply